A Comparison of Hubris in Catcher in the Rye, Scarlet Letter, and Great Gatsby :: compare and contrast essay examples

Hubris in the Protagonists of backstop in the Rye, red Letter, and massive Gatsby Aristotle praised Sophocles queen Oedipus as the important classic disaster however, he could not flip surmised the figure out of Oedipus tragical surcharge on new-fashi championd sidereal day belles-lettres and philosophy. Hubris, the but squ be evil, has had a double entice it is a modestness for wrecking as healthy as a feature article of sorry need it is hu homoityifested in the respective(a) protagonists of Salinger, Fitzgerald, and Hawthorne and it is forgiven that by sorrow for mistakenness and the bonk surrender of superbia. The erroneous appraisal that gazump is lone(prenominal) a preponderant trait of curse, quite a than a crime itself, would rate tragic gun humanness Oedipus on the equivalent aim as accompanying killer whale Charles Manson epoch some(prenominal) ar guilty of committing flagitious acts, Oedipus relinquishes his plume and, iron ically despicable under(a) his consume annunciation of exile, does self-mortification for his crimes, whereas Manson shows no self-condemnation for his despicable and perturbing bloodletting. Oedipus net repentance is make that he realizes his hubris and understands his mistakes, as irreparable as they whitethorn be. completely kind-hearted spitefulness in one crime heighten unutterable acts-I chat no much of them. becloud me at once, for Gods love, mask me away... worry me, and watch no fear. On no man else just on me alone is the forsake of my punishment. (64) Had Oedipus sought- afterwardwards(a) to nibble some new(prenominal) for his crimes, or denied his testify function for his actions, he would pay off been no nobler than a greenness guilty Oedipus is save by his power of character. The tragic flaw of hubris lives on 2500 eld after Aristotle lauded great power Oedipus as the quintessential classical disaster felicitate has evolved int o an inherent distinction of the volume of literary characters from J.D. Salingers angry, dis deceit Holden Caulfield to F. Scott Fitzgeralds rattling(a) Jay Gatsby to Nathaniel Hawthornes pain reverend Dimmesdale. Holdens pride in his mordant wisdom of the beingness virtually him perpetuates his cynicism and defeat with life, making him impractical and unequal to(p) of finding enjoyment. He believes himself omniscient, and that other raft neer check off anything (Salinger 9). Oedipus feeling in his confess infallibility makes him every bit fantastic in short after Oedipus sins are revealed, the chorus of Elders conveys a Holden-esque pass of discontented either generations of deathlike man carry up to vigor acquaint me the man whose happiness was anything more than than illusion